ࡱ> ` E5bjbjss *R$@ CZZZL8vvv!!!8*"Dn",4"""""$>$$ 3333333$5ho7`3ve-u$"$e-e-3""3000e-l"(v"30e-3002J,v2"" `jI!!#.2H3<3042,8.828v2h$'0O)t*$$$33/d$$$4e-e-e-e-D$   Richard Hough Assistant Clerk to the Public Petitions Committee The Scottish Parliament TG.01 Edinburgh EH99 1SP 2 November 2007 Dear Mr Hough Consideration of Petition PE1063 - speculative fee arrangements Thank you for your letter of 5 October, inviting the Scottish Consumer Councils views on the above petition. In principle, we believe that speculative fee arrangements may provide a useful means of increasing access to justice in some cases for those who are ineligible for legal aid and do not have access to other means of funding, such as a trade union or legal expenses insurance. It is clear from the Paths to Justice Scotland research that cost, and fear of cost, is a major deterrent to many people in pursuing a claim. Those with civil justice problems who had considered consulting a solicitor but had not done so mostly gave concerns about cost as the main reason for this, while concern about having to pay legal expenses was greater in Scotland than in England and Wales. The same research found that those on middle incomes felt most disadvantaged in obtaining legal advice, compared with both those who were better off and those on low incomes. There are a number of ways in which this middle income trap might be addressed. These include the proposed widening of eligibility for legal aid on a tapered basis, together with a system of progressive contributions, and increased take-up of legal expenses insurance. Another means of increasing access to justice for this group of people is the use of speculative fee arrangements. Since 1992, solicitors and advocates have been able to offer their services on this basis, in both sheriff court and Court of Session actions, with a fee uplift of up to 100%. Such arrangements, also referred to as a conditional fee or no win no fee agreements, are mainly offered in relation to personal injury cases. As we understand it, under such an agreement, the client agrees that their lawyer will receive an uplift on the fee otherwise payable if they are successful, in order to encourage the lawyer to take the risk of a case for which they may get no payment if they lose. The advantage to the client is that they get someone to take on their case, when they would otherwise have been prevented from doing so by the potential costs. Research shows, however, that solicitors will offer such fees only if the risks of losing are very low and the benefits of winning the case are sufficiently high to counteract the possible risks if the action is lost. This means that only those pursuers who have a very strong case are likely to have their cases taken on this basis. One disadvantage of speculative fees is the need for the pursuer to take out an after the event insurance policy, which will pay the other partys costs should they lose the case. Such policies can be costly, yet unlike in England and Wales, where successful litigants can recover the cost of this insurance premium, this cost cannot presently be recovered in Scotland. The Association of Personal Injury Lawyers has said that this has resulted in a situation where no win no fee arrangements are not universally viable due to the lack of an effective after-the-event insurance market in Scotland. The STUC has also expressed concerns about this anomaly, warning that if the situation is not addressed, it may lead to unions taking on fewer cases, leaving their members to go to private solicitors on a no-win, no-fee basis, rather than having their cases funded entirely by their union. Concern has also been expressed by Action against Medical Accidents that this places those pursuing claims for medical negligence in Scotland at a disadvantage compared to those in England and Wales. It must be borne in mind, however, that the situation in England and Wales is quite different to that in Scotland. In that jurisdiction, legal aid was withdrawn from personal injury cases some years ago, and was replaced by speculative fees and after the event insurance. This has led to concerns that some people who may previously have received legal aid on the basis of a reasonable chance of winning their case may not now be able to find a lawyer to offer them a conditional fee agreement. We would not wish to see such an approach taken in Scotland. While we accept that legal aid funding is not limitless, we see conditional fees as a means of increasing access to justice for those on middle incomes, not as a substitute for legal aid. The issues raised in the petition With regard to the alleged conflict of interest arising from speculative fee arrangements, we have not carried out research into this matter. Therefore, although we can see that such a conflict could potentially arise in relation to extra-judicial settlements, we have no empirical evidence about this. That said, it must be borne in mind that research suggests that around 99% of all personal injury cases, however they are funded, are settled out of court. This suggests that a win in a speculative fee case is unlikely in the overwhelming majority of instances to mean an actual victory in court, as opposed to an agreed settlement. The SCC sponsored Civil Justice Advisory Group chaired by Lord Coulsfield concluded that the courts should be viewed as a last resort, should other less formal means of dispute resolution prove unsuccessful.  We would therefore support increased case management by judges and sheriffs in Scotland across the board, in personal injury cases, as well as other types of case, encouraging all of those within the civil justice system to try to settle cases as early as possible. We have accordingly welcomed the recent agreement between the Law Society of Scotland and the Federation of Scottish Claims Managers of a voluntary pre-action protocol for personal injury claims with a value of up to 10,000. We hope that this will lead to an increase in cases being settled at an early stage, as has happened in England and Wales, following the introduction of pre-action protocols there. Even where a personal injury case is decided by a court, the available research suggests that the award made is usually significantly lower than the amount claimed. A study carried out in 1989 found that awards made by the court were, on average, 38% of the original claim value in the sheriff courts and 47% in the Court of Session. It is also clear that it is general practice for solicitors to sue for more than they expect the case to eventually settle for. In the absence of further evidence, therefore, it is difficult to conclude whether the use of speculative fees leads to a conflict of interest between solicitors and/or advocates and their clients, as suggested in the petition. It is clear that in personal injury cases in general, most settle out of court and the amount awarded is generally substantially less than that sued for. We would welcome further research in this area, as there appears to be little up to date Scottish evidence as to the impact of speculative fees on clients and on the outcome of cases. The wider issues We believe that this petition raises some very important issues in relation to the funding of civil cases in Scotland more generally, beyond the specific matter of speculative fees. While we believe that such fees are a potential means of increasing access to justice, and that their use could be extended beyond personal injury cases, we also think that other alternative means of funding should be considered in Scotland. These include increased take-up of before the event legal expenses insurance, and the possible introduction of contingency fees. Under a contingency fee arrangement, which is currently illegal in both Scotland and England, the lawyer receives a percentage of the court award as a fee if their client is successful. We are not convinced that the conflict of interest argument on the basis of which such fees are made illegal is any stronger than that which can be made about speculative fees. As far back as 1995, we stated that we were not opposed in principle to such arrangements. In England and Wales, the Civil Justice Council, which has considered the future funding of litigation in some depth, has set out a number of overriding principles upon which it considers the delivery of access to justice to be dependent: a meritorious case the participants having at the outset access to means of funding their case the lawyers on each side having at the outcome access to reasonable remuneration the cost of (i) and (ii) being proportionate to what is at stake the availability of an efficient and properly court resourced system The Council has recently concluded, albeit within a different system to that in Scotland, that conditional fees are a key aspect of the future funding of civil justice. It also recommended that a supplementary legal aid scheme should be established, and regulated contingency fees permitted in certain cases. We hope that these wider issues about funding access to justice will be addressed by Lord Gills review of the civil courts. We would suggest that these are fundamental matters which the parliament, and in particular the Justice committee, may wish to consider more fully in the light of the Gill review. I hope that these comments are helpful. Yours sincerely  Martyn Evans Director  Paths to Justice Scotland : what people in Scotland do and think about going to law, Hazel Genn and Alan Paterson, Oxford University Press, 2001  Strategic Review on the Delivery of Legal Aid, Advice and Information: report to Ministers and the Scottish Legal Aid Board, Scottish Executive, October 2004  Section 61A of the Solicitors (Scotland) Act 1980, inserted by section 36 Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1990; The Act of Sederunt (Fees of Solicitors in Speculative Actions) 1992 (SI 1992 No. 1599)  Funding in Personal Injury Litigation; Blackie, Paterson, Phillips and Squires, Scottish Office Central Research Unit, 1998  Written submission by the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers to the Civil Justice Advisory Group, April 2005. Available on the Scottish Consumer Council website at  HYPERLINK "http://www.scotconsumer.org.uk/civil" www.scotconsumer.org.uk/civil.  Personal Injury Litigation, Negotiation and Settlement, Samantha Coope and Sue Morris, Scottish Executive Social Research, 2002  The Civil Justice System in Scotland - a case for review?: the final report of the Civil Justice Advisory Group, published by the Scottish Consumer Council, November 2005.  Personal Injury Litigation in the Sheriff Courts: A Descriptive Analysis, Cameron and Johnston, Scottish Office Central Research Unit, 1995  Personal Injury Litigation, Negotiation and Settlement, Samantha Coope and Sue Morris, Scottish Executive Social Research, 2002  Response to the Law Society of Scotlands Consultation on Contingency Fees, Scottish Consumer Council, 1995  Improved Access to Justice-Funding Options and Proportionate Costs, Civil Justice Council, 2005  Improved Access to Justice-Funding Options and Proportionate Costs; The Future Funding of Litigation- Alternative Funding Structures, Civil Justice Council, 2007     Royal Exchange House 100 Queen Street Glasgow G1 3DN Telephone 0141 226 5261 Facsimile 0141 221 0731 Minicom 0141 226 8549 E-mail  HYPERLINK mailto:scc@scotconsumer.org.uk scc@scotconsumer.org.uk  HYPERLINK http://www.scotconsumer.org.uk www.scotconsumer.org.uk Douglas Sinclair Chair Martyn Evans Director  z{|i y t ´tfR;-jhNRh_Q0JCJOJQJU^JaJ&hNRh_Q6CJOJQJ]^JaJhNRCJOJQJ^JaJhNR5CJOJQJ^JaJ#hNRh_Q5CJOJQJ^JaJhMCJOJQJ^JaJ hNRh_QCJOJQJ^JaJh_CJOJQJ^JaJhNROJQJ^JhcSh7Zh7ZCJOJQJjh7ZCJOJQJU&jh7ZCJOJQJUmHnHu IagqzJ K gd_Q$a$gd_Q$a$gd_Qgd_QgdcSgdXK^,34D5 W X ~  gjXal$ίvavYYYh^JaJ)hNRh_Q6CJOJQJ\]^JaJ&hNRh_Q6CJOJQJ]^JaJhCJOJQJ^JaJ-jhNRh_Q0JCJOJQJU^JaJ hNRh_QCJOJQJ^JaJh}CJOJQJ^JaJh@mCJOJQJ^JaJ!jhNRh_Q0JU^JaJhNR^JaJhNRh_Q^JaJ uvfgIJ&'!$a$gdNR gd_Q $ a$gd_Q$a$gd_Qgd_Q!"RU]^Iy%&'ȷȷȷȷȷքvj\Ivv$jhNRh_Q0JU\^JaJhNRh_Q0J\^JaJhNRh_Q\^JaJhNRh_Q\^JaJh-jhNRh_Q0JCJOJQJU^JaJhhJCJOJQJ^JaJhCJOJQJ^JaJ hNRhNRCJOJQJ^JaJhNRCJOJQJ^JaJ hNRh_QCJOJQJ^JaJhNRh_Q^JaJhNRh_Q56^JaJ' ! !!!##########$O$$$$$$$$$$$$$$% %%+%2%8%A%`%ڹڹڹxmmmememmmh@m^JaJhNRh}^JaJh}h}^JaJ hNRh_QCJOJQJ^JaJ&hNRh_Q56CJOJQJ^JaJ h}56CJOJQJ^JaJh}^JaJhhJ^JaJ!jhNRh_Q0JU^JaJhNRh_Q^JaJhNRh_Q5\^JaJhNRh_Q\^JaJ'!!####a%b%& &''((( )q))))/+0+a,b,$a$gd_ $ & Fa$gd_Q$a$gd_Q gd}gd_Q gd_Q`%b%%%%%&k&q&b'm'''''(())-+.+0+C+V+^+o+p+++++Ҽڱ{{m\NmNm\mNmh@mCJOJQJ^JaJ hNRh}CJOJQJ^JaJh_CJOJQJ^JaJ-jhNRh_Q0JCJOJQJU^JaJhhJCJOJQJ^JaJ hNRh_QCJOJQJ^JaJhNRh_^JaJjh_0JU^JaJh@m^JaJh_^JaJh}^JaJh}h}^JaJhNRh}^JaJhhJ^JaJ++++,5,?,@,`,a,b,,,,,,,,, -H-I-J----....*B*CJOJQJph!jch7ZCJOJQJUh7ZCJOJQJjh7ZCJOJQJU(/ =!"#$8% JDd- b  c >ANew SCC Logob?J|0响}JD nJ|0响}PNG  IHDRLVgAMA IDATxPw j@MVyu%)^ %Lg1B-3= S-d)tTٕ;BשnHQB#Z?k'y͓'@-6牸) 5=;B~kf rϳ\׿+҆IXvFTVRhmm^> P |~K9St?~Rną*7fh:2{cJ~- Vٿ'WUUiZlll<9YS\\$1>!qP>afoX;]4"?a v\yyyliɓ'NАeZ%*t:;;U*UccL&J =Pet:޽{ .CQT[%, V_dݞR Ra---!^nٳGx $Q_d/o>:}]rv뺸Wkf~;2y1T 7VVD|X,EEEz}WWVF̩SZ$Uqb@mV~ZbEz.[e?^sGu.\}!$@D.0IផMQTggRljj"|n߷o_XKu\ZӏT-@;?&b^|ZRcl2[>(s_ޝmɮD%vkdD @.+;;s4xqqRLOO,9(933={;|$%% $'Uö8TP]np{ƀ窈YLZE,HU22*h#=1{Db߾}Z6D֠|yz}naZ/_,bDa="33ӳgw˗/[2m4"iinbbkNgmm'cZގo[خ%v{}}b9x ]dff*))!,}eee6y `{mV"W`<<7NbBb +tFΣNaJx}jJի555$=~8[/^ɒ充CCC---2=pɦ?oȧ~`edX-$(n0QeZ ۛA Ð4TTThV)ڲe+qABkn/-0-,, GϠrHvڪ(++}kZo K.8q?Jȯ?qKx *@J~1Ri2P[[PA,C ,\pL}?zhכBqYK-h}2 ҊY`3m6n^m29~h*a8 ;Yuuu"$ dT5'[Ⓤww~f~ OܛGQ؇Wm۸蘔5kq rVzTMMZ)ÊǦ~yw=_3AG&Q~;Ԕq ;H.bPSG,˫ [[[IzH pPWWW$l5 !H$Jv%Z}YhhzߍtewTeF[LpۺDθK.{_3'={W~y737/b>ϊ[˘K슈*@bf⮝~{>=>u!~kqy.W%H̏ yEQ=x`k b2[nhx"$!I i{ áRO8rHh95/7sZDUTHl0"n|#>?>~/*/D*}W-Oܽl}{oQzCſG1:lp:d0= ?$/E! 8" (59p&` ք{eYxl|~jl~jUzj4CQlˀOO_aYրIOO_@wo-OqϿj_LjoEQs>t% LژI>`ˀPZ| ?hi% {.'ʔwް_JtX^^.XŵZVjmm%\Лn (&Yq1Ē@"59RW7*O~@SNEu]eۍ">g5}ߕtsY6L;ZB,d1Q2279I%¤QĦ׌7m(T4l Dɓ"dcݻ] vi Mjȧs-7V{ԕXEK_k=?HV*c׻ifh%[gΌ{{~to=O+,k{l mJtjϓ}7w`YQ~߱Jr/;cqp$N>hņ'fVN9l|= ]wi:|c rDQTQQQMMM}}'}aa`hmm%Š}pO}tTc#'kn~WzIKlU΄ Len{NsZt,L-ؙ'[&s`ˀh}+>fUm`E E1< pSkO&^ĉi6?RsZ&s}_|oD欬,1|r[~.%w 5 'so27yiҏ7&3jl>'W%bHҏo=9h: z֎ߔlz|]'cܐO |1gVl(ftZY|ZhY1h~ݪ\߶=@(%msSnzYG5_vݣ.ѣʝ9WqUvKcLҐcq\`[ܬRElVÑHfՒ[e^HAË9GHΐ`Ft~i%zۻS9r W{?~Dn,r'/s Qk VCCCZZd 6C|$+15ph<1g~ޥ >%LJ>+Oi=v>]7ZΑ7S$ٟD+7,BYt:FTVV&PkAUh$9s&|,2v4IzWy+i= ŧϯ+sF MJc*gPi׫4lqg6@ =.A»px*JhGG} ٽcZb2>f gfSJ"|E轨s'>W_>[/@V @.^A+G ^␬sAgz҂JQ5ZΑ"DJjӬAu]^/&1`0H~MY^^^[[";;;|h${577JLD.lSS.Ӟp[ϭb?"&)J8577L&ѧIln[j\p8T}1@}nY\+G#hb!jteѣ322MS$>d2t:`&\^SS\{1 SO-EF&-~4+&ǰSӄߚpϽp̖ IH^/flpݻݻw\\h$ؘt:]!'wTi&|Sas@;߿1JۼRkJv%~G1l/_`qDR(* ^ⳝ|\^WWGrkәWYYI2$pL4NÏ=_?+јCoX,Ȼ'!!^KdT#= xI޴7}NKRD @@gϞ=vX)|555;ဦzSXmmm*j޽Ǐ-sQTFˉNhL&ZVRYYP(l6e,hŸMm&-Qσ_rs !I#Ȏþ|)FD,;::!@.v}9@t]]]uuu;vsСC>]1yyy/ՒDSSSf^1SSbB9NX۷od̥'t^wQ'|N*YYx鑆Maڤw XV{y,P!sv9˞iU*)RI768CnN$~:W'< d;3T}566}bرcRrc_&3)466&*z.,fw~O'z,*,Qgm:=Tf|oVϓׯ R"Vri52g 9*VNvw]ٞ$=@"HGObyw?9zh!R4(-Z{J% 9QKuwppӧw\+%j5vHozjO\4Z LB^FN vNvC[(W)FA -0Y,~:Ѓ/:8EccT*gI{)0J9V+P_9=#$ҏyqUk]7E;>2P\珽vmBoiZ\KۿYN2 ކe/YgF- !TmXt;I[{Zۊ| MwkqW(AO`vyMEҊ@J(8y7@Ha_X[---Ql~HI?ޅeR?U*?{%@EEF^h4þr|GN~~~mmmiiiooАvjjj>={{nRt7nqFTfe sE+d<0w$䯶a!D]+dݢleruy@>Z.fLӅ"yvz壙&ĎY!(OviY7n gV hbUQQO l` ?3 u`Y f u`9_y0亏Z*eg  ~[:R ]9qmCݬTf-V,_?m^[ءj[Yj0' HL}W=[cD-gCNLn;I=zsY-,@)8qmIkeh&f-ԄKP`!7]krN&BC\(63ۚ\)[K eZ&޿Y5DɋPSGDMHibakC 4 4fww]L)@@7N3 [͘e4WC)ɞT>`W,@#1 IDAT<Oj|kvyg 鈵Ao& .{Q&1 %8@@@\xkBHo ټ H"쮩1_rRIc}Hr쮩ñ>JyPj yTfo͋ϙX>3G.Wsy$M1BD␶˞'Hf* 2ed  YЛqnMF- 0(C! B q%2n{`Ve-d l0'p5c/ H9NtA-i}UU:2M Rښ<{'|W. Es($XBzkiKr6,) @@R7(:ݨ5weⵅ`=RIRUESd?ˡoS^.Yv .G! b[Grw%1[ssGoi`u=OS8CY.kl G|lMwa-<ˈr0ذZ؍:w5BU*)M%sv `n;К8" ߡ3#ԓ?~Un93c=1A6u9}+.򚻽ڒdEfZ۴ rro6 ,}HeO˥Q)߮:<)e\h6 Enkq¼.t (E qm_wj@p?:cuOsn]qoʀތn˳1vۖo )bA"eTwa̿.ݝ-N bv⤣-lGc {Ѻ[.oۏausHKdzϗ$CwEƃLvL}GZ&Γ#Dh]x< Mo;&DGkT6=̾=-4Do,}V;hSG8ߟqG@A(OkrCf^u>9 -ZYV+ +晥?.nݗW˘%)EɟE떋h i61E#hleX2+I!@[k( E &Ɠge7QHu떋\ >2U<{.60 r!8ټCܘzuvXU;tzD@ v 9FX]S[<P`*~UnCW϶'l1[cjN[3r5(7^lZ &H,aotC1 O@N}NJ%e-+:E,Sӆ0 Lt+XG?_RLűA,:˨Z&~_$CD!H>_U\1îŸ-mUcugCn`ZX>fyc1>QJ ik6 ʓ9J%i~ ~x!8220DƍsY&f %c*9 Un9Tc=,Ȗ즄CKE9LBCY&{eugHv "w {D4B&ăy{~6޷ϘX3 ֘sXJ&e<ʌ-<Zoz_~]KYs]WhU{1ZB#c-k2d9PDCR %{KqELbzN-ic(rf m?dZ$HHEA5ܨ}蚤wh*ҍKRu\r<(h!gi>#ߘ3:9'sbJ7SlEŚ(Ng&<_ryje)*Oܩu@5=IFR)pSԘ Tt:qcl9pnqnq6nZ-Kl~  GV{D3%[3& Rm.?䞌K߱WLxrn\,3Lf;.ޖ%'Tx &lu~,ǦH>'4:{o+H=8蕉bIOs%ԥ h!*GV=RQ=zEƋ[{m?_ٯq5]}e^& )ZP3u  Ы;IhfJٔF?3=7 ^D>?’w|]+r] rOMR}"]w~/Uc֯tu ? uL8^ ~s{Ԃ"Gި{.C1dԘsLNUX|ycӳﰔϷ"p,2hsE uCWhVw=ٝ%:[r̘ ϏN]v9ٙAt`>SMͿl+ҵgx Aݘ#gBy(4Kq@(6f]߻;enHK[}7ыc*RJ2W9wKr('ӔnZ,%*Jќ@ L~/~LڱڅwEya[\lXB(EG>ӵ%7|Eǟh'N>9aݠmw$H}x qY Ƭ7~d\Ժgs'R!PfZU*zF#!6'sjq{.nZڴCYs./Lˎ E`$ 4Wat>3ej2L*8i^Dbc{ڤtl^\5\=N$r=͗? aj̹)J.x%S$隨zzU\ʪ1FZcc4/3P$ 4dE?(ΗWtU+vjZkޮ~H8yWJCs : 5X _G=k%(+F]{&?#̸jzZDb̰B's{6X 1>KٿXvC-{(/쮪h'( H{ B!(VvUz%_Ui3ꚩQ@EQa$Qm:V]#bbc?<Ɯ[_uS>8,Voh&/_IO ec{X74s+'[qŎ:9Y/؝#_s(;̩(^2ƜzzPl)<{BX=}WKaJLPQWQ'r0 ˆu=7430rO~j֯eo{thmkg%&Y=;?Wj2ި6fOL^{Rdv<)ET({9$BfjaAbGQsDM gtr_ޖ곋 Yk4ܜcd"t}=ON罤ˌ+7i"E~+|idW󎵺Yjo{-Ѡ1drxĐU2S5PϷs72`HhՆL]Y!̟t̸"?'3]4|n7ien7W0^ÿЬ#]I7j i}8WI:vgvDMttt@xgϞ |7n PXXh6~TB]]ݥK^S~Ѽ!?w0dPWW522[oǏ'0 Cy׮]\K__N ", cjj*&w8^ԩS> $7;;;M&Ç#p;=ݻβX,O8qNjl6p\ Eqhep8L&S?Tݻ/^Mwxx.@ @tjͧ~ 5} OG4KRK666BZ/({jjsrrCmm DC _#H\.J2ɘBI/( @8$777^g)sΉJ~)ZooP=@ccc\39W(0vW]Przv; '4 (5:H+% d:ɝ~cc#NA a：xס} g1 0<<,[H[S] @asDRU订M4u3%!4"oHx<HY2,.kX?H7B.N)@=>c7l&iHmk ѷ,X xA ok +xl5D RPP(5E!!ELY@҅ jU`3g 6?[,(//gF@ عs nhhb{. Dl`QRlhPaEK;v >Z(Qp80&E]]vȌn̚L&hx}}}U:$N۳g0gΜW_$|'o;90?υbS&0[p:Ne/# D#; >t`FRԐY|Q~͛|%WHKBDK D2L&)> IDATSHfXAc0(fAަݕ5!vpဤ4E@UU,SzG3lra@,˞r?~<}B:l6իWO> A͢=A7o.,,dl6T&$???" AYkmmmO l!3$u\=0 V^^4 >1㊮O;ӉDjbuvv޸q#qYbt bD׻&ۻߦ0f_ b1S*Rc*H JV @aa2ؚ){q8MgԹܓk-`}nbw Eo$hlBj0IUg+Jxё,%~&yeuǏEY+:a)-ɲb+J[Rڥ't:_~Ѻ/_Cz u:_~ɉvdo8?~g`U 6SSՋLs]dLeɓdкU KJש֭[JF(s ܹ2/cy\^e'thAMҗ'Ov֡,B}1βl8JӚӟ5W:M׊c Y_'}S ѽws[kA fi_W3\{dM>}1]9dKo߾@L)uxx(u?Q`0t2햛p PpZ|RŬ%ϟ+,KӴ;;;[kx<gE e>O>m$ef4:m9aokg`0 l"`g&Cn &ѝ@g۷7y߯Uj{N)իWR4MehRJ'~C{Y<49Ryݻu2,`{{4u>\`ixFl;vm_v ϲl\^~-v~<[[[64-\ɣѨnㆢjVKwƘ'HGUܳˡWXyv?~\g;;-\+/BuTfy9h $Iu],R+Y]xR5| E20 \^(*Jhpɳ.V|Y)J@X/s WAϟ DOJUeߡ:l6Nn8~왼cE>Hk%yf:J9  }@kHWxlvqqsO/Dtqqaݿ."Wo/^ \M$GvYea*K Uܳb:v,pi^ gɴW($gf$ zAFWq޽Y־?^{%L&sp͛SnJkEuaĵW9zU jjNQhhq7R~"7IFKA @lx|ppJd}*`kmmm srd2z< dʲ̕,Sr5%}]8~өP*0 '"IENDB`Dd: b  C >A&Martyn's signatureb0>puS 9K n0>puS PNG  IHDR{sRGBgAMA a cHRMz&u0`:pQ<PLTE  !!!"""###$$$%%%&&&'''((()))***+++,,,---...///000111222333444555666777888999:::;;;<<<===>>>???@@@AAABBBCCCDDDEEEFFFGGGHHHIIIJJJKKKLLLMMMNNNOOOPPPQQQRRRSSSTTTUUUVVVWWWXXXYYYZZZ[[[\\\]]]^^^___```aaabbbcccdddeeefffggghhhiiijjjkkklllmmmnnnooopppqqqrrrssstttuuuvvvwwwxxxyyyzzz{{{|||}}}~~~]} pHYs )I7IDATx^\{pGY%˲-[ɲd^Ζ}gA/8)**r]RB-w5,9RlRpeKRM(E >lh)͌FIpk4_w}_ A*-'SqӃ>IagYV%X{<3[w`3\!u,z?I*'F|X{K!~\Sl'aftPrM1 X=ƒ^_/V1VXXA,RÊJH ǐk5'Kbm}To qN|b5k&m u2 >.Ow>cW m,,*M~c-ZZȮ`Ek3bm^7|XfяMoV5LS+]%?q;k 7jPdYcK*:е_p$qwIgL[Eր<cݘ/X9t;R"SkstF~s%yS0WgȋuRU]A1kdAjFHX=0|&Br~N\Y֛OkGlAR&aaSE,W.esޮYor k$O X6cx(xeoWҪ99 dA,D* XX-;EmvP%b]8+?|J`Z+ r0Y>7 lkXaV'W;u߮.fz:BCowSfud'B@3-y` Múߠ]tP38[vSj>B׾؜d, |X}Ey}i^v+Y6E/u};ʷs4Ӻ}ExlkK\0y82qH@ωYZx=#mp 9fGf _(WPajlҁ)n7N*,$C0dl\=Y^q 0|3P94vT+1G+uO2|XݣlD!\Ow~IP+^0XY9b iMwl<)֘OD鲐Qw\Wd֋(k(Rbiђ)As/L߃ (O E"RT3T<c ~ 8s {3j*Ke`AFQIBK2 _qkq`u/ޓ9pOSJ_l<2!T] ! yKAMYnջ9NT&r1tJ3ٮ(A\8r|Rke/u+Mk]dYܜ)/M^ vnob-d9\o>kPx+dxI$lNvZc(. c%fZon:-6&]Yoj-a~^ہ{MK`]Tif3] v#ELb)EWi ӟֶ.m @ڣe8s^3LYB-ό>EBr pҬߥQDK{ncH!\D:3JSO/fkpD(ƇZ -(gui6e66 Ȥ:Ud0Lo>Wq{bg-Ac-+ gg7V'ḾtGApW2X?G@f͍=# pP;*!/NWnjs$}(객ٴVfu/HgF<" [Goaf!CL6k%9C={ls{]bub{c9TQȣo[GKs)ئq J) +n [vXǗtF<06iۚ5"-4EQl%L#D]OJ"PMM9#¹cwxT(xXq/dFsjYj:Ƒz.^!>ؓ±Ւq ,&i8z $N萵uc]3QQv4mUABh3CbJ_D͖X՘) ޱHH+oě V&ߣH/\󀝀_;HƼdzHa!#it}LcŖ7競:XЎhi{o>V5K"HRXT7o[-BQ7E =s&&hzu[sA@P_ʴ(Z#TXǜ?Dud, %uZ&L!^siucQ?)c2БJ%4TVZ0u`1"i-ߩ廆ˆJŵġS _PWi+}D]ș >FJc Űgֹic[KwrXZlt)Cs?9vm⹢%'W22$39#gkOQ4gLNq;U |dg!mXc uEn`h$xyGCGGB1h`s3]1V" ܌f41vё0Y N.&ʨԖ?R ~9͓mg$aIX7'b !`btc0X$•;n uzC"Kf2s:5R˯?>-#mfn[2iD. ta`o<<$# ӣ&҅)5y<tarI`@%]XC~k~"7?Šd$àMV]}'3fڰ3>)mX=`"mXo"cGM_7W4mڰ9I3; Qpiú(4ߩtHօȩlta=3'V"O xta= >`f8BTc8fbIAfJ?rk 3]mailto:scc@scotconsumer.org.ukDyK www.scotconsumer.org.ukyK @http://www.scotconsumer.org.uk/8@8 Normal_HmH sH tH D@D Heading 1$@&5CJOJQJDA@D Default Paragraph FontViV  Table Normal :V 44 la (k(No List 0U@0 Hyperlink>*B*@V@ FollowedHyperlink>*B* << indent1$a$ CJOJQJHB@"H k^ Body Text$a$CJOJQJmH sH 6@26 _Q Footnote Text@&@A@ _QFootnote ReferenceH*~  !-#E- 4  G8?B@ABE-@ABEE-R IagqzJKuvf g IJ&'ab  !q!!!!/#0#a$b$$$$$$$$H%%&&<';((l))}*~**N+++++++++++,,,',7,8,P,h,~,,--#-)-*-7-@-A-B-C-F-0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 0 0 0 0 0000000000000@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@000?@0h00@0h00@0h00@0h00h00000000000000000h00000 IagqzJKuvf g IJ&' !q!!!!b$$$$$$$$H%%&&<';()}*~*N+++,,',7,8,P,h,~,,--#-)-*-7-@-A-B-C-F-000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 0 0 0 0 0000000000 j00j00j00j00j00j00j00j00j00j00j00@0 00?j000j00j00j00j00j00j00j00j00j00j00j00j00j00j00j00j00j000   '`%+04E5 !#$&( !b,3E5"%'D52fBXEXX/X2$HʾɜB's932$Hu &-˘93@(  N  3  B S  ?E-q% t _Hlt500127273 _Hlt500126991,,F-,,F-.|, $T,t gijDJ“DÓJēiœƓD~Ǔ,ȓ4ɓtʓD˓̓L͓[Γϓl6Г,ѓғ~ӓ~ԓt&Փn֓ד9ؓNٓkړ|KۓThܓ$eݓaޓ  0ߓ)<< T*%&ggH T okkq}}GGzzQ^^I"I"&&&(()),,',',F-      !"#$%&'()*+,-ppO Y w$$ssxOOYeeQ"Q"&&&(())&,&,.,.,F-  !"#$%&'()*+,-:*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsStreet;*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsaddress8-*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsCityB,*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagscountry-region9.*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsplace> *urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags PersonName  .-,,.,.,,,.,,,.,.,.,,.,,.,.,.,,.,.,-. ,.-.-.~!!$%%p&x&~((>*C*++++++++++++,,h,o,C-F-bh$>''':(((++++++++++++,,',2,C-F-333333333z{`bbm $$**+,,-"-(-(-@-@-A-A-C-F-$++++++++++++,,F-YHVTh ^`o(hH.h ^`hH.h pLp^p`LhH.h @ @ ^@ `hH.h ^`hH.h L^`LhH.h ^`hH.h ^`hH.h PLP^P`LhH.YHV/        }?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxy{|}~Root Entry F@I!Data *e1Table]8WordDocument*RSummaryInformation(zDocumentSummaryInformation8CompObjq  FMicrosoft Office Word Document MSWordDocWord.Document.89q